எபிரெயர் 7:11

King James Version (KJV)
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

American Standard Version (ASV)
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need `was there’ that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?

Bible in Basic English (BBE)
Now if it was possible for things to be made complete through the priests of the house of Levi (for the law was given to the people in connection with them), what need was there for another priest who was of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?

Darby English Bible (DBY)
If indeed then perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for the people had their law given to them in connexion with *it*, what need [was there] still that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be named after the order of Aaron?

World English Bible (WEB)
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

Young’s Literal Translation (YLT)
If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood — for the people under it had received law — what further need, according to the order of Melchisedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron?

எபிரெயர் Hebrews 7:11
அல்லாமலும், இஸ்ரவேல், தங்கள் லேவிகோத்திர ஆசாரிய முறைமைக்குட்பட்டிருந்தல்லவோ நியாயப்பிரமாணத்தைப் பெற்றார்கள்; அந்த ஆசாரிய முறைமையினாலே பூரணப்படுதல் உண்டாயிருக்குமானால், ஆரோனுடைய முறைமையின்படி அழைக்கப்படாமல், மெல்கிசேதேக்கினுடைய, முறைமையின்படி அழைக்கப்பட்ட வேறொரு ஆசாரியர் எழும்பவேண்டுவதென்ன?
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

King James Version (KJV)
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

American Standard Version (ASV)
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need `was there’ that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?

Bible in Basic English (BBE)
Now if it was possible for things to be made complete through the priests of the house of Levi (for the law was given to the people in connection with them), what need was there for another priest who was of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?

Darby English Bible (DBY)
If indeed then perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for the people had their law given to them in connexion with *it*, what need [was there] still that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be named after the order of Aaron?

World English Bible (WEB)
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

Young’s Literal Translation (YLT)
If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood — for the people under it had received law — what further need, according to the order of Melchisedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron?

King James Version (KJV)
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

American Standard Version (ASV)
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need `was there’ that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?

Bible in Basic English (BBE)
Now if it was possible for things to be made complete through the priests of the house of Levi (for the law was given to the people in connection with them), what need was there for another priest who was of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?

Darby English Bible (DBY)
If indeed then perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for the people had their law given to them in connexion with *it*, what need [was there] still that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be named after the order of Aaron?

World English Bible (WEB)
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

Young’s Literal Translation (YLT)
If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood — for the people under it had received law — what further need, according to the order of Melchisedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron?

எபிரெயர் Hebrews 7:11
அல்லாமலும், இஸ்ரவேல், தங்கள் லேவிகோத்திர ஆசாரிய முறைமைக்குட்பட்டிருந்தல்லவோ நியாயப்பிரமாணத்தைப் பெற்றார்கள்; அந்த ஆசாரிய முறைமையினாலே பூரணப்படுதல் உண்டாயிருக்குமானால், ஆரோனுடைய முறைமையின்படி அழைக்கப்படாமல், மெல்கிசேதேக்கினுடைய, முறைமையின்படி அழைக்கப்பட்ட வேறொரு ஆசாரியர் எழும்பவேண்டுவதென்ன?
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?